Monday, July 18, 2011

Teaching Tip

Teaching Tip:
These websites have examples of multilevel quizzes and interactive activities that are appropriate for English language learners. They are also good examples of internet-based activity banks that can be created using activity builders such as Hot Potatoes:
·         www.a4esl.org
Here is a collection of quizzes for English learners. It includes grammar, vocabulary, and crosswords at different levels of difficulty.
·         www.english.abcingles.net
This site offers tests at different levels. It includes reading comprehension tests.
·         www.eslcafe.com
Dave Spirling’s ESL cafe offers a variety of activities for language learners.
·         www.eslactivities.com
Here you can find a variety of classroom activities and games for individual use by ELLs.
·         www.teflgames.com
This site provides interactive games and quizzes for English learners.
Interactive quizzes at different levels.
·         www.triv.net
The trivia quiz site offers quizzes for higher-level ELLs. It includes content-area quizzes.
These interactive quizzes were created by both teachers and publishers. They are good for high-level ELLs.
·         www.english-test.net
This website holds exercises and tests of different levels for ELLs.
A wide variety of exercises including grammar, vocabulary, and reading at three levels.
Grammar-based quizzes as well as word puzzles, such as scrambled words.
·         www.eslprintables.com
The website where English Language teachers exchange resources: worksheets, lesson plans, activities, etc. The collection is growing every day with the help of many teachers. If you want to download you have to send your own contributions.
·         www.englishpond.com
It covers vast areas of English (ESL, EFL, ELT, ESOL) learning and teaching. Our materials include among others : Printable Worksheets, Self-grading flash quizzes and Exercises, Video Lessons, E-books Powerpoint lessons and more.
·         www.englishclub.com
This website helps you learn English or teach English. You'll find everything from lessons for learners to jobs for teachers, including fun pages like games, quizzes and chat - all free!
http://busyteacher.org/
Free printable worksheets for busy teachers like you. find free worksheets and lesson plans when you need them.

Tuesday, July 5, 2011

Paper presented in CONEST 7 (PPB Atmajaya Jakarta)

A MOOD AND MODALITY ANALYSIS OF ARGUMENTS
IN SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL DEBATING

Ignasia Yuyun
Krida Wacana Christian University (UKRIDA), Jakarta, Indonesia
ignasia_y@ukrida.ac.id

Abstract

This paper seeks to demonstrate the systemic functional approach especially mood and modality analysis in applied linguistics research, via a case study of the representation of arguments in Indonesian senior high school English debating. The paper will centre around the students’ English proficiency in debating, which will then be related to mood and modality system looked at in this study. The background and the related literature of the study is first discussed, which is followed by an account of the methodology. The paper will then delineate the results, showing that the arguments in debating are represented through the extensive use of the declarative mood, median probability, extension conjunction, questions and commands in declarative, explicitly subjective modality, and realization of metaphorical explicit subjective modality.

Keywords: argument, debate, mood, modality, senior high school, systemic functional


I. INTRODUCTION
Critical thinking has turned to become more important in contemporary teaching and education circles. In line with this, some Indonesian high schools and universities have been trying hard to develop students’ critical thinking through debating. This is in line Mitchell (1998:41) that critical thinking ability is significantly improved by courses in argumentation and debate and by debate experience. Of course, to help developing students’ language skills of efficient listening, convincing public speaking, and debate (argumentation) in relation to extensive reading and follow-up writing.
Moreover, debating as a public speaking activity is the act of public communication involving a transaction between a speaker and an audience. In debating, the speaker efficiently delivers a “listenable speech” that is received and understood by serious listeners (Berko et al. 1999:299). Of course, the speaker might need a variety of ways to deliver an argument in debating. This is in line with Mc Gregor (2001:2, cited in Emilia 2009) that since an argument functions as the heart of critical thinking, it expresses and supports a viewpoint on an issue and an issue is a matter of public debate on which there are different views. In addition, in an argument, the speaker or the author presents a point of view and attempts to persuade others of the validity of his or her opinion (Feez & Joyce 1998; Shulman 2004:148; see Emilia 2009).

1I. CONCEPT AND THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
In debating, a speaker’s linguistic proficiency is measured through some linguistic features. Thus, the Theoretical Framework of this study based on the theories of Functional Grammar especially Mood and Modality (Halliday & Matthiessen 2004; Eggins & Slade 1997; Halliday 1994) function as the fundamental framework in identifying the representation of arguments in debating. Mood has evolved out of the requirement that language should serve as a means of action, a way of exchanging goods-and-services and information (Halliday 1989:68). By looking at the mood structure, clause by clause, we can see the way the dialogue proceeds as a series of exchanges (Halliday 1994:102). While, modality refers to a speaker’s attitude towards, or opinion about the truth of a proposition expressed by a clause. It also extends to his/her attitude towards the situation or event described by a clause.
Moreover, in line with Halliday & Matthiessen (2004), Martin & Rose (2007:138), Feez & Joyce (1998:141), Anderson & Anderson (1997), and Derewianka (1990:76-78) suggest the following linguistic features the speaker might use in delivering argument including (1) the use of words showing the author’s attitude (modality, such as should, must, ...); (2) the use of nominalizations aiming to make the argument sound more objective and to help structure the text; (3) the use of conjunctions or connectives associated with reasoning (therefore, so, because, because of, the first reason, etc); (4) the use of objective language making opinion sound “objective”; (5) the use of variety of verb (process types) – action, linking, saying (say, argue, point out, assert) and mental (think, perceive, understand). Such emotive language is more appropriate to spoken debate, and essays are generally more successful if the speaker seeks to convince the reader through logic and evidence.
Further, the use of two previous studies has each significant contribution to this study too. Zhixiang’s study (2006) on “A Functional Analysis of Interpersonal Grammatical Metaphor in Political Debates” contributes some perspectives on analyzing mood metaphor and modality metaphor in debate. Furthermore, Gadd’s study (1999) on “A Systemic Functional Analysis of a Televised Political Debate before the 1996 Australian Federal Election” also provides detailed linguistic analysis and interpretative discussion to help in analyzing arguments in debating. Unlike these two previous studies, the present study explores more fully mood and modality analysis and interpretative discussion in order to investigate the representation of arguments in debating.

III. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
The subjects of this study were volunteers who are members of debating club in a private senior high school in Bandung. They have been familiar with debating activity and debating competition for more or less one year.
Moreover, the procedures of data collections employed in this study were observation through video recording (Lutz & Iannaccone 1969, cited in Marshall, et al. 2006) and discourse analysis (Travers 2001:4). By making use of the observation, it is expected that the language competence in expressing arguments performed by senior high school debaters may be figured out obviously through recording. Moreover, the discourse analysis enabled the text of debate was transcribed from the video into written text in a broad sense. The excerpt from the text was then analyzed on the basis of the following steps: dividing sentences carefully clause by clause, number the sentences and each clause, and code the elements to ease the way of analysis.

IV. RESEARCH FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION
1. MOOD ANALYSIS IN SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL DEBATING
This section includes mood type, mood adjunct (conjunctive adjunct), and mood metaphor. Firstly, dealing with mood type, there is a big variety of the mood choices of the speakers in debating. In the delivery of arguments, as throughout the debating, the most common sentence type by an overwhelming margin is declarative mood with positive polarity (90%). Meanwhile, other sentence types were spread over the debating around 1-6%. These declarative statements are used to give information and convey certainty: as Halliday points out, a declarative sentence such as ‘it is’ conveys the highest possible degree of probability, more even than ‘it must be’ (1994:357). In this case, the speakers wish to appear to be authoritative speaker whose opinions are not to be doubted.
Moreover, conjunctive adjunct that commonly used is extension (54%) followed by enhancement (41%) and elaboration (5%). The analysis of conjunctive adjunct tells the structure of logical relation through elaboration, extension, and enhancement. In this debating, the argument is largely hold together by extending relations (54%) including addition, adversative relation, and variation. In particular, addition was the most common employed by all speakers (40%). The other types were spread over the debate round 1-32%. These infer the speakers’ concern is to tell audience the supplementary information in order to improve it or make it complete, as well as the link among sentences, or the variation of meaning of the motion.
On the other hand, spatio-temporal and causal-condition were the most common employed of enhancement in this debating as well; both of them are causation and consequence where the speakers’ concern is to tell their audience both why things happened and what would be the result of them. For example, thus, so are used to signal that a conclusion is construed as the expected outcome of the argument that has been presented. First, second, next, then are used to sequence arguments, or piece of evidence in the debate (Martin & Rose 2007:138).
Moreover, the rare use of elaboration suggests the speakers rarely use exemplifying and giving exploratory in delivering their arguments. Whereas, giving example and explanation are crucial in a debating.
The last mood system is mood metaphor based on speech function and mood type. In this study, commands and questions are mostly realized in declarative mood (58%). This indicates the speakers prefer using declarative mood to metaphorically realize a command instead of the typical use of the imperative mood. Therefore, their speech tone is softened and the social distance between them and the audience is shortened so that they are more likely to get the audience’s understanding and support. In addition, it is found debaters sometimes replace declarative mood with imperative mood for the sake of emphasis.
Alternatively, the speakers use statements realized in interrogative mood (26%). It suggests speakers sometimes play both of the roles of speaker and audience. They ask a question, and then they answer it themselves. And this makes the debating sound as natural and vivid as if it were a dialogue with the audience. Therefore, the audience is much likely to accept his argument.
In addition to the use of mood metaphor, the speakers also use statements realized in imperative mood (16%). In the debating, as Zhixiang (2006) stated that when the speakers want to explain something, they usually use the clause let me…, that is, an imperative tone upon a simple statement. In other words, the declarative meaning is metaphorically realized through the imperative structure let me…. This kind of structure serves to make the speaker’s presentation sound more authoritative.

2. MODALITY ANALYSIS IN SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL DEBATING
This section includes modality type, modality value, orientation and manifestation of modality, and modality metaphor.
Firstly, the modality type including modalization (epistemic modality), which consists of probability, and usuality and modulation (deontic modality) consisting of obligation and inclination. Overall, modalization-probability is the most common in all speakers (77%), followed by modulation-inclination (10%), modulation-obligation (10%), and modalization-usuality (3%).
As the dominant modality type, the probability indicates the speakers explicitly or implicitly qualifies their commitment to the truth of the proposition expressed by the sentence they utter (Lyons 1977:797) cited in Vázquez and Giner (2008:175). This analysis also inferres the speakers mostly use probability to express their attitude towards, or opinion about the truth of a proposition expressed by a clause. In the debating, the probability is expressed through the use of modal finites (would, will, can, should), mood adjunct (maybe), mental verbs (know, believe, realize, see, think), and nominalization (possibility = it’s possible) to express the speaker’s degree of force or certainty concerning the claim.
Secondly, in connection with modality value (high, median, and low). The finding shows median probability (would, will, think) mostly common used by the speakers (45%). The second modality value mostly employed in the debating is high probability (know, believe, realize, see) (25%), followed by low inclination (can) (11%), median obligation (is/are to, should, are supposed to) (7%), low probability (possibility, maybe) (6%), median usuality (usually) (3%), and high obligation (obligation, force) with (3%). On the contrary, there is no employment of high, low usuality, low obligation, and high, median inclination.
As previously mentioned, probability is dominantly used by the speakers in delivering their arguments. In addition to the use of probability, median probability has the highest percentage (45%). The use of median probability by the speakers indicates most speakers convey their opinion with median certainty since epistemic interpretations have to do with knowledge and understanding regarding the level of certainty of a proposition’s truth (Griffiths 2006:111).
Moreover, the speakers employ high probability (25%) to deliver their arguments since they must convince audience concerning their opinion. In line with Martin, et al. (1997:70), by using mental verbs (know, believe, realize, see) the speakers have high level of certainty to what they understand. In other words, they confidently deliver their knowledge and understanding through high probability. As the rest, low probability is expressed through mood adjunct (maybe) to show the speakers’ low level of certainty.
Thirdly, Orientation and Manifestation of Modality found in the debating including implicitly subjective, implicitly objective, explicitly subjective, and explicitly objective. The finding shows explicitly subjective modality is the most common in all speakers (35%), followed by implicitly objective modality (32%), implicitly subjective modality (31%), and explicit objective modality (2%).
In delivering arguments, the speakers express explicit subjective modality through mental verbs such as know, believe, realize, see, think and causative verb ‘force’ (=must). Meanwhile, implicit objective modality is expressed through mood adjunct (maybe, usually) and predicator (is/are to, are supposed to). In addition, implicit subjective modality is shown through finite modals (would, will, can, should, have to) and explicit objective modality is expressed through nominalization (it’s obligation, it’s possibility). These indicate the debaters try to give the prominence to their point of view and to highlight the firmness of their attitude or belief so as to win the audience’s support and understanding (Zhixiang 2006). By using mental verbs (know, believe, think, realize, see, feel, want, tell, say, try), the debaters explicitly construct themselves as the source of the assessment, and to some extent, place their authority to assess at risk (Martin 1995:23). In line with this, Halliday and Matthiessen (2004:624) stated explicitly subjective modality is the most effective way to give prominence to the speaker’s own point of view since modality represents the speaker’s angle; either on the validity of the assertion or on the rights and the proposal.
As regards with the modality metaphor, the explicitly subjective and explicitly objective forms of modality are all strictly speaking metaphorical, since all of them represent the modality as being the substantive proposition. The finding clearly shows explicitly subjective of modality metaphor is the most common in all speakers (90%). Whereas, explicitly objective modality metaphor was employed 10% in all speakers.
Explicitly subjective form of modality is shown through clauses based on the semantic relationship of projection. In this type, the speaker’s opinion regarding the probability reveals his observation is valid and coded not as a modal element within the clause, which would be its congruent realization, but as a separate, projecting clause in a hypotactic clause complex. For example, to the congruent form it probably is so corresponds with the metaphorical variant I think it is so, with I think as the primary or ‘alpha’ clause (Halliday 2000:354). The reason for regarding this as a metaphorical variant is that the proposition is not, in fact, I think; the proposition is it is so.
In the debating, debaters sometimes would like to emphasize the subjectivity of their points of view so as to make one’s statement more assertive; and the most effective way of doing that is to dress it up as if it was this that constituted the assertion (‘explicit’ I think) (Halliday 2000:362). The subjective nature of the assessment is reinforced by the modality in a separate clause.
Overall, as shown in Chart 1, arguments are represented through the extensive use of the declarative mood, and where markers of modality occur, they indicate median probability. Moreover, debaters use some mental verbs such as think, believe, know to express their explicit arguments. In addition, the cohesive arguments are also used in debating through conjunction. Finally, the speakers employ a variety of ways to convey their arguments realized metaphorically in terms of mood and modality.

Chart 1 Representation of Arguments


V. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
This study demonstrates that Systemic Functional Grammar, characterized by its multi-level and multi-function, could provide us with a theoretical framework for genre analysis. Moreover, through the functional analysis, we find that language form is consistent with its function. In addition, this analysis is helpful to understand the interpersonal meaning of the debating from a new perspective, which elaborates the subtleties of language use in debating. Therefore, this study also has important pedagogical implications for both students and teachers. Students improve their English skill so that they can develop their communicative competence more effectively, particularly in debating. Meanwhile, teachers may have a better understanding of genre analysis, debating in particular.


BIBLIOGRAPHY


Anderson, M., & Anderson, K. 1997a. Text Types in English 1. Australia: Macmillan.

Anderson, M., & Anderson, K. 1997b. Text Types in English 2. Australia: Macmillan.

Berko, R. M, et al. 1999. The Public Speaker/The Public Listener Second Edition. Los Angeles: Roxbury Publishing.

Derewianka, B. 1990. Exploring How Texts Work, Sydney: PETA.

Eggins, S and Slade, D. 1997. Analysing Casual Conversation. London: Cassell.

Eggins, S. 2004. An Introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistic Second Edition. London: Continuum International .

Emilia, E. 2009. Argumentative Writing. Bandung: Indonesia University of Education.

Gadd, N. 1999. A Systemic Functional Analysis of a Televised Political Debate before the 1996 Australian Federal Election. Melbourne: University of Melbourne.

Griffiths, P. (2006). An Introduction to English Semantics and Pragmatics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Halliday, M.A.K. 1985/1989. Spoken and Written Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Halliday, M.A.K. 1994. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. New York: Edward Arnold.

Halliday, M and Hasan, R. 1985. Language, Context, and Text: Aspect of Language in a Social-Semiotic Perspective. Victoria: Deakin University.

Halliday, M.A.K. and Matthiessen, C. 2004. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Arnorld .

Martin, J.R. 1995. Interpersonal Meaning, Persuasion, and Public Discourse: Packing Semiotic Punch. Australian Journal of Linguistics 15 (1995), 33-67.

Martin, J.R. et al. 1997. Working with Functional Grammar. New York: Arnold.

Martin, J.R, and Rose, D. 2007. Working with discourse. London: Continuum.

Mitchell, G. R. 1998. “Pedagogical Possibilities for Argumentative Agency in Academic Debate.” Argumentation & Advocay, Vol. 35, No. 2.

Travers, M. 2001. Qualitative Research Through Case Studies. London: SAGE Publication Ltd.

Zhixiang, Z. 2006. A Functional Analysis of Interpersonal GM in Political Debates. Unpublished Thesis.

Tuesday, June 28, 2011


English for Young Learners:
Lesson Planning and Classroom Management

by Ignasia Yuyun

INTRODUCTION

Management skills for teachers are very important to support successful teaching learning activities in classroom. Therefore, providing a structured environment where children consistently know what to expect, is the key to classroom management. Although, specific techniques change from teacher to teacher, the common denominator is the understanding that when students are well managed, there exists a better opportunity for everyone to learn.
Teachers create lesson plans to communicate their instructional activities regarding specific subject-matter. Almost all lesson plans developed by teachers contain student learning objectives, instructional procedures, the required materials, and some written description of how the students will be evaluated. Many experienced teachers often reduce lesson plans to a mental map or short outline. New teachers, however, usually find detailed lesson plans to be indispensable. Learn to write good lesson plans - it is a skill that will serve you well as a teacher. If you're really serious, become proficient in writing effective learning objectives. All lesson plans begin, or should begin with an objective. Toward that end, teachers have developed a self-instructional, interactive program that teaches this important skill within the context of lesson planning.

A. CLASSROOM MANAGEMENT

Classroom management skills are related to three main areas: creating and maintaining motivation, maintaining classroom control and discipline and organizing learning activities. Classroom management will also be influenced by teaching styles, the amount of pupil independence that is acceptable in the context, the amount of competition and cooperation the teacher establishes in the class and the role and the use of the L1 in the class.
1. Motivation
                Motivation refers to feelings, a goal, a mental process, a certain type of behavior or a personal characteristic. More recently, motivation has been seen as a set of beliefs, thoughts and feelings that are turned into action. According to Dornyei (1998:117), “motivation has been widely accepted by both teachers and researchers as one of the key factors that influence the rate and success of second/foreign language (L2) learning”. In line with this, Cajkler and Addelman (2000), suggest that in order to keep levels of motivation high, language teachers should adopt a ‘critical attitude’ to the activities and tasks they use and the expectations they create. This is done so as to develop a healthy questioning of the work they prepare for their pupils and the schemes of work they follow.
                We have already referred to the need to provide a classroom atmosphere which promotes pupils’ confidence and self-esteem so that they can learn more effectively and enjoyably. This echoes two key factors in motivating learners that Dornyei describes. The first is how far a learner expects to be successful in doing the task, the second is how much the learner thinks being successful in doing the task is important.

2. Classroom control and discipline
Here we shall consider five main areas that help to create an effective learning environment.
a.    Establishing routines
                When children enter school they are faced with a new set of social routines and relationships which even a kindergarten may not have prepared them for. According to Nelson (1977) children develop scripts, or mental maps, to understand routines in their lives in the same way that adults do.
Young children gradually become familiar with established classroom routines that help to make them feel confident. Anxious or immature learners will tend to react negatively to changes in the normal classroom pattern, so it is a good idea to develop familiar patterns with young learners in their first year of schooling.
The children may become very bewildered and uncomfortable if the teacher talks to them all the time in a strange foreign language. Gradually introducing pupils to use English for a short period of times through songs or rhymes will help to ease them in slowly.
b. Finding a balance
                Finding the right balance between order and flexibility is very important. The most effective environment for learning is often found in a classroom where the teacher is firm but kind and encouraging so that pupils, especially very young children, feel confident and happy.
                One way of establishing this is quickly getting to know pupils’ names, as this will help to create a secure and friendly atmosphere. It will also enable the teacher to control and discipline the class much more effectively.
c. Getting the pupils’ attention
                With young pupils teachers may need to establish a signal for getting the pupils’ attention. When teachers want to gain the attention of the whole class by following these steps:
·         Firmly name the children still talking.
·         Start a well-known activity or routine or give instructions for a new activity to keep the pupils’ attention.
·         Wait for quiet before beginning a new activity.
·         Once there routines have become established you should be able to cut down on the amount of time teachers spend disciplining pupils.
d. Finding an acceptable noise level
                Most language teachers would find this acceptable, as long as the talk is ‘on task’. If the noise level rises too much, pick out the noisiest group, name on of the children in the group and gesture them to quieten down. Remember that the noisier the teacher is, the noisier the children will become.
e. Giving praise
                Teachers can quickly establish good relationship with pupils by praising good behaviors, commenting on good work, making helpful suggestions and encouraging pupils’ efforts. This is important in setting the right atmosphere, providing a good model for children to follow and boosting pupils’ confidence and self-esteem.
                What teachers are trying to do when giving praise is pin-point what teachers like by being specific, give praise with sincerity and enthusiasm in variety of ways. Here, teachers can use praise consistently and frequently, especially when pupils are first learning something. Teachers also can praise groups or the whole class as well as individuals. At last, vary to whom teachers give praise and look for and name at least two children who are doing what teachers want to avoid ‘favoritism’.

3. Organizing learning activities
                When children endlessly repeat activities on the same topics or when language activities are pitched at the wrong level or are too mechanical, they are liable to become frustrated and noisy. In some contexts pupils’ main motivation is to pass English test and they may be less willing to engage in activities which they think so not prepare them for these. Therefore, teachers must determine an appropriate balance between teaching to the tests and other language learning.
a. Dealing with bilingual pupils
                If these pupils’ learning needs are not catered for, they may become bored or disruptive, which is a pity as their skills can be seen as a bonus. Use strategies for encouraging these children to: ‘show and tell’ some of their experiences in the country of the target language; try to explain the instructions for games to groups or even act as the teacher on demonstrating a game; help others in groups; make recordings of stories or other listening activities; write stories, instructions or descriptions for other pupils to read and act upon; make games which require sentence cards pr board games and ‘Chance’ cards: test pupils, e.g. spelling and complete individualized work at a higher level.
b. Managing pair and group work
                Berman (1998) suggests that very young learners prefer working alone and can be reluctant to share. For some activities it is often easier and more fruitful to organize work in pairs than in groups where pupils can easily work with the person next to or behind them.
                There are several ways of organizing groups to work together. The easiest is to ask pupils who sits near one another to form a pair or group. Another method is to use the children’s choice. Such friendship groups are probably the most popular with pupils and these may work well. Other ways of organizing pupils into groups include choosing group members using features of a project the pupils may be doing, or language they have just learned.
c. The effect of different kinds of classroom activities
                Activities which usually engage and stir pupils are those where the learners are physically or mentally active and thus more involved in their learning. These include critical thinking activities, physical activities, and calm activities.
                Here are some general principles for using stir and settle activities:
·         Start a lesson with a settling activity to calm pupils down if they seem very lively or restless.
·         Make sure lively, stirring work returns to something calmer and more settling.
·         Make sure everyone has something to do, especially in group work.
·         Avoid activities which are emotionally or intellectually ‘empty’ or meaningless.
·         Try not to have a sequence of only settling or stirring activities throughout the whole class.
d. The mixed ability class
                Many textbooks assume that all pupils are at the same language level, whereas the average classroom is normally of very mixed ability. The following are the checklists that may help teachers to pinpoint difficulties which may have arisen because of the organization of learning activities:
·         Was the task given to pupils too difficult?
·         Was the task rather boring and mechanical with too little contextualization or focus on meaning?
·         Was the task too easy?
·         Was there too much ‘dead time’?
In each lesson there should be a core of the most important concepts, skills and language that should be straightforward enough for everyone to do. Teachers may then need extension activities to challenge the more able pupils and more support activities for the less able. Making activities that cater for different levels is called mixed ability teaching or ‘differentiation’. To do this successfully, teachers can organize differentiated learning activities by considering the following seven key factors: the text used, the task used, the support provided, the outcome demanded, the ability group used, the range of activities used, and the choice of activity.
When teachers are doing in providing more support is choosing a selection from the following kinds of scaffolding:
·         Breaking down the learning sequence into smaller steps
·         Simplifying the language, narrowing the range of possibilities
·         Using more spoken language before moving onto written language
·         Translating abstract concepts into more concrete ones
·         Using physical movement
·         Using more audio-visual support
·         Providing a greater variety of activities
e. Time management
                It is very useful to plot realistic timings for the completion of certain activities; this avoids having to rush, which may lead to inattention of ineffective learning.
When ending a lesson, here are several points to bear in mind:
·         Plan
·         Finish work on the main teaching point a little early rather than late
·         Take time to explain homework beforehand and give an example
·         Plan a teacher-led review session at the end of each class
f. Classroom organization and layout
                Careful planning of classroom is very important as it helps to create an organized and secure atmosphere. There are six points to consider:
·         A grid plan made to scale is especially useful if you have a large class squeezed into a small area
·         Think carefully about whether you want the children to sit in rows or groups
·         If you decide to have a ‘teaching base’, make sure you have a clear view of the whole room
·         A story corner for younger children is also a good idea.
·         You may also like to include a listening or computer corner which is screened off by cupboards or screens to provide a quiet corner for listening to cassette of stories or for a computer activity
·         Make sure you include some areas to display children’s work, using notice-boards, screens or a table
g. Keeping teaching records
                Teaching records are a kind of teaching log, memory aid, or remainder of the language points or the stories and topics which have been covered in a term.

B. LESSON PLANNING

Rivers (1981: 484) reminds us that ‘ A lesson is not a haphazard collection of more or less interesting items, but a progression of interrelated activities which reinforce and consolidate each other in establishing the learning towards which the teacher is directing his or her efforts’.
Ur (1996: 213) describes a lesson as follows: ‘A lesson is a type of organized social event that occurs in virtually all cultures. Lessons in different places may vary in topic, time, place, atmosphere, methodology and materials, but they all, essentially, are concerned with learning as their main objective, involve the participation of learner(s) and teacher(s), and are limited and pre-scheduled as regards time, place, and membership’.
1.    What is a good lesson?
A good lesson is adaptable and flexible; is a back-up system; has clear objectives; has a variety of activities, skills, interaction, materials; caters for individual learning styles; has interesting, enjoyable content; has an appropriate level of challenge and is well prepared, well planned and well timed.
In line with this, Kizlik stated that good lesson plans do not ensure students will learn what is intended, but they certainly contribute to it. Think of a lesson plan as a way of communicating, and without doubt, effective communication skills are fundamental to all teaching. Lesson plans also help new or inexperienced teachers organize content, materials, and methods. When you are learning the craft of teaching, organizing your subject-matter content via lesson plans is fundamental. Like most skills, you'll get better at it the more you do it and think of ways of improving your planning and teaching based on feedback from your students, their parents, and other teachers. Developing your own lesson plans also helps you "own" the subject matter content you are teaching, and that is central to everything good teachers do. (http://www.adprima.com/wlo5.htm)

2. Why plan a lesson?
Children learn more easily when they know what to expect in a lesson and what the teacher expects of them. It makes them feel more secure and more confident. It also enables them to predict situations and the language and behavior likely to be used in them.
A well-planned lesson makes a teacher feel more confident and professional. A lesson planned in advance in all respects, with clear aims, clear statements of how the aims are going to be achieved, how time will be managed for each stage, how the class is to be arranged, which visual aids and technical aids will be used, material prepare in advance, means that a teacher can give full attention to the pupils before, during and after the lesson, and to parents should they have contact with them.
The process of reflection helps teachers monitor their teaching and identify their strong and weak points as well as evaluate their pupil’s learning and form the basis for future planning.
Finally, lesson planning provides accountability by providing a record of work which can be shown to school authorities, inspectors and parents, or used by another teacher who may have to substitute for the class.
3.    What is involved in the lesson planning process?
a. Syllabus
                A syllabus provides a list of the language items that are to be taught, how they are to be taught in which order, and how long it should take to teach them. The syllabus is provided through the contents page, the course map or a scope and sequence chart. Besides, the accompanying teacher’s guide to a course will usually provide detailed guidelines on how to teach each lesson than those suggested.
                Initially, less experienced teachers are likely to follow a plan closely but, with more experience, will learn to adapt course books and lessons in a much more flexible way according to the pupils’ needs and interests.
b. Learners’ needs
                The needs of the children and how they learn must be considered first so that teachers achieve a balance between the language aims of the syllabus and the needs of the children, which involve their all round general education.
A major consideration when planning a lesson is how to provide optimal conditions for learning so children are motivated and interested in learning, understand what they are being asked to do and why, get plenty of meaningful exposure to the language, get plenty of variety and are allowed to work at their own pace, experience success, feel confident and secure to try out language, have plenty of opportunities to use language, and opportunities to review and reflect on what they have done and why.
Other aspects to be considered are the linguistic and cognitive demands of language activities. We need to ensure that the tasks we ask our pupils to carry out in the language classroom are ones with reasonable degree of effort or challenge, can be completed successfully. This means that we need to be able to evaluate tasks and materials in terms of the linguistic and cognitive demands they make on our learners, and to be aware of the kinds of tasks pupils can cope with at specific stages of their development.
c. Content areas, materials, and methodology
                Content areas provide the material as well as suggest the way things should be taught. Teachers need to evaluate whether the subject matter or content, material and the methodology is entirely appropriate for pupils.
                Methodological preparation can help pupils understand the reasons for choosing a certain methodology, decide to modify this slightly by adapting and supplementing materials to keep more in line with their expectations.
4.    How can I structure a lesson, select, sequence, and time activities?
The typical structure of most lessons consists of three main stages: a beginning, a middle and an end.
The selection and sequencing of activities throughout a lesson needs careful consideration.
·         Activities that settle children either positively in the sense of calming them or negatively by boring them into some kind of unresponsive stupor.
·         Activities that stir pupils in the sense of either stimulating or unsettling them.
·         Teachers need to know more than what language learning it will encourage.
·         Teachers must be aware of what general behavior it is likely to encourage, it will help teachers judge if the activity or sequence of activities is a good choice for a particular lesson or group of pupils.
·         Teachers need to consider the involvement factor when selecting and sequencing activities.
·         Teachers need to think in term of variety, firstly think of how teachers can offer variety and then how best to combine different activities (types of activities, types of interaction, language skill, tempo/pace, stir/settle, involve/ occupy, difficulty, level of pupil responsibility, classroom arrangement, materials).
The followings are some general guidelines teachers may like to consider are:
·         Begin and end lesson so that children perceive their English lesson as an ‘event’ which has a specific structure: a beginning, middle and an end.
·         Depending on how long lesson is, consider putting harder activity earlier as pupils will probably be fresher and more energetic.
·         Decide at which point it is best for class to be lively
·         Think carefully about transitions from one stage or activity cycle to the next.
·         End on a positive note.
Good time management skills facilitate the smooth running of a lesson. Knowing about the linguistic and cognitive demands that certain lessons make on your pupils will help you judge how long an activity is likely to take.

5.       How can I write a lesson plan?
There is no ‘correct’ way to write a lesson plan, but it should give a clear picture of what you intend to do (aims) and how you intend to achieve them (procedures).
a.       Use a lesson planning/record sheet


Date ________________ Class _________________ length of lesson ___________________
Materials ____________________________________________________________________


             Aims                                                        Plan (what I intend to do)         Record (what I actually did)
Grammatical structures
Functions
Vocabulary
Pronunciation
Skills
Learning to learn
Other: social, psychological,
Cultural, educations/cross-
curricular, citizenship
education
Classroom management
Assumption
Anticipated difficulties
Evaluation:
Did I achieve my aim?
What worked well? Why?
Why not? What would I do
differently next lesson?
Why?


b. Decide how to achieve aims
The procedures below applies the Plan-Do-Review provides clearly defined stages and combines the development of meta-cognitive and cognitive strategies. The different stages on the plan include:
·         Plan: Beginning the lesson
-      Warm-up
-      Reviewing of work covered in previous lesson
-      Informing pupils of the lesson aims
·         Do: Activity cycle
-      Plan: Activity cycle (s)
-      Do: Activity cycle(s)
-      Review: Activity cycle(s)
·         Review: Ending the lesson


6.       How can I evaluate a lesson?
To help in evaluating lessons teachers may like to tape or video record the lessons, ask pupils to comment on the lessons or invite a colleague to sit in on a lesson and observe. Afterwards, answer the following questions individually:
  • Did I achieve the aims stated on my lesson plan? If not, why not?
  • Was my lesson different from my plan in any way? How and why?
  • How did I move from one stage of the lesson to the next? What did I say to the class?
  • Did I keep to my timing? If not, why not?
  • Were my pupils active and involved in the lesson? Why? Why not?
  • Did my pupils learn what I set out to teach? How do I know?
  • Did my pupils respond positively to the materials and in English?
  • Were there any problems? If yes, why?
  • What would I do differently next time? Why?
  • What did I do better this time than ever before?
Then, come together and compare the comments. Finally, lesson planning differs from teacher to teacher and each teacher has their own preferred way of planning a lesson.

III. CONCLUSION

            Teachers are expected to be able to manage classroom effectively in order to run teaching learning activities successfully. Here, teachers need to know some effective techniques in managing classroom. Besides, teachers are expected to create their own lesson plans, it means teachers have taken a giant step toward "owning" the content they teach and the methods they use, and that is a good thing. Acquiring this skill is far more valuable than being able to use lesson plans developed by others. It takes thinking and practice to hone this skill, and it won't happen overnight, but it is a skill that will help to define someone as a teacher. Knowing "how to" is far more important than knowing "about" when it comes to lesson plans, and is one of the important markers along the way to becoming a professional teacher. The corollary is, of course, that there is no one "best way" to plan lessons. Regardless of the form or template, there are fundamental components of all lesson plans that teachers should learn to write, revise, and improve. The old adage, "Practice doesn't make perfect; perfect practice makes perfect" is at the core of learning this skill.


Brewster, J and Ellis, G. 2002. The Primary English Teacher’s Guide. England: Pearson Education Limited.
Laslett, R and Smith, C. 2002. Four rules of class management, in Pollard, A(ed). 2002. Readings for Reflective Teaching, pp218–21 (Reading 11.4). London
Linse, C. T. 2005. Practical English Language Teaching: Young Learners. New York: McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
Paul, D. 2003. Teaching English to Children in Asia. Hongkong: Pearson Education Asia Limited.